|
Topic: Web Hosting Business | Print This Article
| Email This Article
| 79 Views |
|
They call it “Sweeps Week,” but it does not resemble the buzz that television networks build during ratings wars. Instead, the “sweeps” refer to the widespread audits that the Business Software Alliance (www.bsa.org) routinely launches worldwide to nab companies using software improperly. A recent, global sweep resulted in $10.5 million in enforcement action recoveries. At any given moment, the BSA has well over 500 active investigations in the United States. In 2001, the BSA collected more than $13 million from companies using unlicensed software. The companies involved range from auto sales companies to Web design firms. One online auto sales company paid the BSA $143,666 after a self-audit revealed more copies of software programs from Adobe, Apple, Macromedia, Microsoft, and Symantec than it had licenses to support. One e-business agency specializing in Web design, network integration, and support paid $65,000 to the BSA, resolving claims it had more copies of software from Adobe, Autodesk, Microsoft, and Symantec than it had licenses.
According to the BSA, worldwide dollar losses due to improper use of software amounts to an estimated $10.97 billion — a significant drain to software providers. If a company is caught, penalties can be stiff. In civil action, the owner can seek to stop you from using its software immediately and request monetary damages. The owner also has the option of choosing between actual damages — that is the amount lost because of your infringement, not to mention any profits attributable to the infringement — and statutory damages, which can be as much as $150,000 for each program copied. In addition, the government can criminally prosecute for copyright infringement, resulting in possible fines of up to $250,000 and jail sentences of five years. Busted In the wake of massive industry layoffs, recently fired I.T. employees are only too happy to unload the dirt about their former employers to the BSA. “Typically, someone calls or reports something from a company that they either work with, or used to work with,” says Robert Holleyman, president and chief executive officer of the BSA. “They tried to get something done about it, but couldn’t. That’s when they come to us. Most employees would never think about stealing someone’s hardware. That’s too complicated, and besides, you wouldn’t want to bring that kind of attention to your company if you get caught. But many think nothing of stealing software. Our message is: You should. There’s a very real risk in getting caught.” The results can be devastating. “This is the bomb in the closet of many hosting companies, and ex-employees have their hands on the detonator,” says David Bates, cochairman of the Technology Practice Group at Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart (www.gunster.com). “Failing to manage software licenses has been the nail in the coffin for many companies.” Over the limit It can be a no-win situation for hosts and service providers. Buying licenses is as tricky as buying insurance. Buy enough to cover what you need, and you have made a smart purchase. Buy too little, and you have potentially exposed yourself to uninsured damages. Buy too much, and it is the equivalent of purchasing $200,000 worth of renter’s insurance to cover a college student’s efficiency apartment. Still, the latter might be the lesser of two evils, says Mark S. Holmes, special counsel at the IP transactions practice group at Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP (www.townsend.com). Holmes recounts the experience of a hosting provider audited by a software company from which it had licensed several programs. The provider came up short on the needed licenses for one of the programs and was threatened with copyright infringement. “In its defense, the provider found it had paid for more licenses than it used for another program with the same software company,” Holmes says. “While the software company rightly countered that overpayment on one of its programs did not make up for copyright infringement of another of its programs, the software company did take the argument into consideration in settling with the provider. The example highlights the dangers of failing to know what software the host provider has installed and whether the number of seats — or users it actually makes use of — is covered by a like number under its license. “The software industry is becoming more vigilant and vigorous in its pursuit of unauthorized software use,” Holmes continues. “As the economy weakens and software companies look for new sources of revenue, finding unauthorized users becomes an increasingly attractive means of increasing revenue and meeting elusive sales figures.” Holmes recommends a monitoring program for hosting providers. Such a program should list the program name, version number, serial number, number of seats, and expiration date. “Automated programs can alleviate the menial work of monitoring hard drives and comparing what programs are installed versus what is actually licensed,” Holmes advises. “Other advantages to monitoring programs are avoiding the risk of human error and the proof of compliance as evidenced by the reports generated by the monitoring software.” As Seen On: WebHostDir |
Most Viewed Articles & Guides
Web Hosting & Domain Name Glossary - 3,562 Views Securing Your Web Presence (Part I) - 567 Views About - 556 Views Skins for Cpanel & Ensim - 538 Views Submit - 529 Views Web Developers can be successful Web Hosting resellers - 526 Views Bandwidth and Data Transfer - 520 Views Take a Load Off - 512 Views Contact us - 484 Views What is Colocation Hosting? - 477 Views |
|
Related Articles & Guides
The Yankee Invasion: Competetion for US Data Centers Co-location vs. A Dedicated Server The Art of Staying Neutral Should I be using an Application Service Provider?Leave a Reply
|